The way that Parisa
felt that she was treated by her European peers really interested me while I
was reading. They thought of her as a stereotypical Muslim woman and were not
expecting her to be creative and expressive. Her peers were not open minded
what so ever when it came to Parisa’s culture. They were only thinking of her
in the stereotypical way. Her European peers seemed to be practicing the
essentialist views of culture since they could only view Parisa in one way and
were surprised when she acted another way. Essentialists see culture as very “black
and white”. They don’t see how culture can be intertwined with others and how
individuals within a culture can still be unique individuals. The idea that if
you think that you need to know about someone’s presumed national culture before
you can effectively communicate with them is also something that caught my
attention while reading. By thinking that you need to know about their culture
first, you are defining the person before you even meet them. However, that is
how essentialists think. They think that each culture is completely different
and that all the persons in a culture are the same. A non-essentialist would
get to know the person first before making a judgment on that person. The
saying “you can’t judge a book by its cover” is how a non-essentialist would
view the idea of communicating with people and getting to know them. The
thought that when people are in strange environments, they can sometimes exaggerate
specific aspects of their culture kind of confuses me. I understand that when a
person is in and awkward situation, they tend to stick to things and topics that
they are most comfortable with. However, I find it odd that people would play
into the stereotypes that society has given their own culture. Like I said
before though, maybe they think that those aspects of their culture will be
able to be understood best since outsiders to their culture have probably some knowledge
of the stereotypes. I feel like being comfortable is what the essentialist view
of culture is all about. In the essentialist view, cultures are not
complicated. The borders between different cultures are very clear and there is
no mixing, no connections and no critical thinking involved. In my opinion, the
essentialist view is rather boring. I also agree with the idea that we all have
our own unique cultural identity. As Holliday shared, he is part of a variety
of different cultural groups and so is everyone else. If people within the same
cultural groups find themselves being part of other and different cultural
groups, then I think it’s obvious that even people that share a culture can
still be very different. We talk about this idea a lot in my Bilingual
Education classes. A lot of times, Hispanics are lumped into one large cultural
group. While these students may share the same native language and in that
sense share an aspect of culture, they are all extremely different. A student
from Mexico and a student from Honduras eat different food, listen to different
music and may even speak different dialects of Spanish. It’s important, as
future educators, to recognize that even though students may seem similar in
certain aspects, they are all unique and have their own experiences that shape
their own personal identity and culture.
No comments:
Post a Comment